5945 最新/相關裝修需求單

2012-06-29 新北市淡水區

【 系統櫃 】
需訂做系統櫃的簡易門

2012-03-27 台南市新營區

【 系統櫃 】
有兩個房間要做衣櫥的系統櫃

2012-03-06 高雄市鼓山區

【 系統櫃 】
我想定一個系統衣櫃 謝謝

********* ****** heels accent and other content inconsistent with other evidenc

0

procuratorial organs prosecution stage, cou ********* ****** heels rts have c ********* ********* for men onfessed to taking the stage violent strangle hold,********* ****** heels, and ** forcibly molested Wuzui Yang Moumou, but there estoppel, the confessi ***** ******* *** cher on of guilt is not stable. Yang Moumou confession Hugejiltu on height, hair, clothing, accent and other content inconsistent with other evidence, which said Yang Moumou for height 1.60 m, 1.65 m, autopsy report confirmed Moumou 1.55 meters tall; its said Yang Moumou hairstyles for long hair,********* ********* for men, straight hair, autopsy report confir ***** ******* *** cher med Moumou Department short hair,***** ******* *** cher, perm; it does not wear a jacket for said Yang Moumou, Moumou autopsy report confirmed a jacket; it called for Yang Yang Moumou speak Mandarin and speak a dialect of the witness testimony is not consistent. The original verdict of guilty of hooliganism Hugejiltu addition to its statement. After the verdict,***** ******* *** cher, Hugejiltu with no motive, request a lighter treatment on the grounds of appeal.The Court finds that the facts of the crime of second instance, the evidence is consistent with the first-instance judgment. On the grounds of appeal raised Hugejiltu inadmissible, the court rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict and approved.Retrial,*** ***** *******, the complainan *** ***** ******* t Moumou, Shang Moumou request fair judgment on the case as soon as possible.Counsel raised the fact that the original sentence is unclear, insufficient evidence, should be declared innocent Hugejiltu defense advice. The main reasons: 1, Yang Moumou go to the scene of the time and Hugejiltu have committed crimes not reasonably exclude the existence of contradictions,*** ***** *******, is not logical. 2,********* ********* men, Hugejiltu of means to implement crime,***** ******* *** *** cher, the circumstances and other relevant testimony, details are constantly changing, it is difficult to determine, there is a contradiction can not reasonably be excluded. There is no direct documentary evidence. evidence evidence, such as inspection and appraisal confirmed Hugejiltu crime. Yang Moumou identified gripe about the neck caused by suffocation due to the fact that Hugejiltu unclear,***** ******* ****** online, insufficient evidence. 3,*** *******, Hugejiltu about Yang Moumou dress, physical appearance, accent characteristic of confession contradiction with the objective facts, not consistent with common sense. 4, Yang Moumou blood consistent with Hugejiltu nail cracks attachments blood typing, blood typing, but does not have a unique scientific, within Hugejiltu fingernails attachments for human blood type O,***** ******* *** cher, is difficult to identify Yang Moumou is blood.Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Procuratorate that the original verdict Hugejiltu intentional homicide, hooliganism unclear facts, insufficient evidence, should be adopted retrial procedure, judgment of acquittal.After identifying the retrial, the evening of 9 April 1996 around 19:45, the victim Yang Moumou said go to the toilet,***** ******* ***, leaving the road miles from Hohhot *** ***** ******* incense restaurants, night 21:15, was found strangled due to neck died of suffocation 57 bungalows on the west side of public toilets in Inner Mongolia factory dormitory inside the ladies room. The trial defendant Hugejiltu Yan and his colleagues in the evening after dinner break after been to the ladies room, then returned to work on the unit called Yan into the incident ladies room and saw Yang Moumou bear in wall After the state on Hugejiltu and Yan went to a nearby security guard post reported.The above facts, witnesses Yan, Shen Moumou, who confirmed Hugejiltu evening activities and report cases of testimony. there is no other evidence to prove that.The Court finds that the trial verdict finds Hugejiltu defendant guilty of intentional homicide, hooliganism unclear facts, insufficient evidence. Defense counsel's comments, opinions prosecution prosecutors be adopted. To support the complainant's request. Judicial committee to discuss the decision by the Court, in accordance with the "People's Republic of China Criminal Procedure Law" Article 245. confirmed the incident scene scene investigation notes, Yang Moumou Department confirmed to be caused by suffocation death gripe about the neck autopsy report, the evidence on the trial the defendant Hugejiltu evening activities such as confession and excuse to be confirmed, the Court recognized.The trial verdict found the defendant Hugejiltu Wuzui violent means, gripe about the neck and other victims were rogue obscene Moumou, Moumou suffocation caused by the fact of death, there is no reliable and sufficient evidence to be confirmed.A criminal trial means the defendant confessed Hugejiltu inconsistent with the autopsy report. Hugejiltu testified from behind Moumou Moumou cover mouth with his right hand,***** ******* ***** ******, left hand khaki neck backwards while dragging Moumou twenty-three minutes into the wall,*** a main ***** *******, and the "deceased mediastinal large area of bleeding,red bottom shoes for women," the autopsy The injury report discrepancies; Hugejiltu testified that bear on the wall Moumou, in the case of the head dangling,***** ******* *** cher, Yang Moumou stuck his neck with his left hand more than ten seconds, and "Yang Moumou Department is gripe about the neck caused by suffocation,***** ******* *****, "the autopsy report concluded inconsistent; Hugejiltu Moumou Tam testified that on the wall,*** a main ***** *******, when Yang Moumou Moumou Wuzui still breathing, but also with" Yang Moumou Department strangled neck caused by suffocation, "the autopsy report's conclusions do not match.2, the blood expert conclusion is not exclusive. Criminal Identification scientifically proven Hugejiltu left thumb in the fingernails attachments detected human blood type O, and Yang Moumou same blood type; evidence examination report confirmed Hugejiltu I type A blood. But blood was identified as species identification of objects, not exclusive, unique, can not be confirmed Hugejiltu committed a crime.3, call Geji Le confession of guilt unstable figure, and many do not fit between the existence of other evidence. Case Hugejiltu investigation stage in the public security organs. 相关的主题文章: http://www.52dafang.com/home.php?mod=space
u67j85479 (14 積分) 發表於 Jan 9, 2015 系統櫃

要回答此問題,請先 登錄註冊.